【案例】信息化如何铺就电子制造企业的智造之路？

My view is that at scale humans tend to gravitate around some kind of average beauty standard. I see this for physical beauty, fashion, music, movies, book, etc. AI does a great work at taking all our content and generate something new while maintaining the average underlying patterns that trigger us to find the new content good/beautiful. I think the main issue at scale is that despite all the gains in productivity in the last century we are still mostly working 5 days per week (in developed world) and there is little time for developing art/critical thinking. Our problems are societal not technological anymore…

I can literally feel the video of the Creed guy running around Cowboys stadium in that dumb oversized jersey singing With Arms Wide Open as I read this….

I have a different take. I absolutely agree that "movies by committee" would not be good movies. But, AI has the ability to customize for my taste. And since no one is going to make me a Fantasy/Sci-Fi Mashup that has Arnie as Conan the Barbarian, John Wayne as a space cowboy, and all my favorite Star Trek cast members from various shows in an epic saga that also fits into the 45 minutes I have right now... is it not true that AI might make something that is better for ME? I feel like the ability to prompt AI with a list of my favorite books and authors, then give it a spin I think I would enjoy today and a time limit for the time I have right now could create something better for me even though you might hate it. And sure, lots of legal issues. Leaving those aside.

The more Cardbordeaux we drink, the better it will get!

Did you mean that it will “suck” or that it will “stick?”

AI has actually been influencing popular entertainment for a long time. Several years ago (before genAI or LLMs where even things), I was talking to an executive from one of the big Hollywood studios, who told me they already had an in-house developed AI that could analyze a screenplay and predict, with surprising accuracy, how well it would do at the box office, and they would tweak the scripts to be more profitable. He knew it was killing creativity, but letting the AI guide them to making the box wine of movies made financial sense.

what I find perplexing is that what they are quoting as cliche is actually a word-for-word plagiarism from Kansas's Dust in the Wind... which is hardly music's "average fare", has been absolutely influential and is rarely referred to as a "bland cliche". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_in_the_Wind That the authors of this article (as well as a much better and more thoughtful review of the band in the Atlantic) didn't notice this is stunning. Especially since they are reviewing a song called Dust In the Wind lol. Perhaps this says something aobut the the quality of journalism and music criticism, another area being taken over by the AI. I do agree on the main point here: a lot of the popular art is done by algorithm and is completely commoditized. And thus is ripe for AI replacement. But i also don't think AI music is always going to be bland. AI is a tool, curation and selection here is human. People find a way to say new things with new tools. Some folks at one time only 40 years ago thought that electronic synthesizer music was always going to be bland and derivative. It's rather clear now how wrong they were.