俄罗斯称国防预算将分阶段下降
American Enterprise Institute
Dedicated to defending human dignity, expanding human potential, and building a freer and safer world.
In today’s newsletter, we examine MAGA voters’ views on isolationism, student loan policies in the reconciliation bill, and manufacturing employment decline in America.?
1. Iran, Isolationism, and MAGA
Topline:?Of self-identified MAGA Republicans, 90 percent say that “preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is important to U.S. security.” AEI’s Marc Thiessen?contends?that MAGA voters are not splintering over debates of isolationism, contrary to speculation from some commenters after the US strikes on Iran.
The Numbers:?In the same poll, conducted before the US strikes, 74 percent of MAGA Republicans said that preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons mattered a great deal to US security, while only 64 percent of non-MAGA Republicans said the same.
A Vocal Minority:?A small number of loud right-wing isolationists have skewed the perception of Trump’s base, Thiessen asserts. In reality, MAGA Republicans are highly unified behind President Donald Trump and Israel.
“On virtually every metric measured—from support for Taiwan and NATO to concerns about democracy, human rights, China and U.S. leadership—self-identified MAGA Republicans are more supportive of strong, principled American leadership on the world stage than their non-MAGA GOP brethren.”—Marc Thiessen
2. Higher Ed in Reconciliation
Topline:?Senate Republicans released a new proposal aiming to ensure college graduates earn enough to repay their debt—otherwise, their college programs will lose federal student loan eligibility. AEI’s Preston Cooper?finds?that the vast majority of degree and certificate programs would maintain eligibility under the new rule.
The Calculation:?Benchmarks are calculated by comparing the earnings of alumni to high school graduates in the same state, both several years postgraduation. The proposal is part of the Senate reconciliation bill.
Who Passes the Test:
The Shortcomings:?For many degree programs, former students will make slightly above the benchmark but still face huge levels of debt. Cooper argues that adding incentives for colleges to reduce debt further for low-earning programs and introducing lower borrowing limits would strengthen the proposal.
“Overall, the Senate’s “do no harm” proposal would strengthen the higher education system. But the current political environment presents a once-in-a-generation chance to fix the broken federal role in higher education. Lawmakers shouldn’t miss the opportunity to go further.”—Preston Cooper
3. Age of Protectionism
Topline:?Manufacturing as a share of total nonfarm employment has been declining since the end of World War II, and tariffs are unlikely to reverse this trend. AEI’s Michael Strain?illustrates?that the declining manufacturing employment rate is not justification for protectionism and is a misunderstanding of underlying job dynamics.
Driver of Decline:?The manufacturing employment level has been falling since well before China entered the World Trade Organization in 2001 or NAFTA was created in 1994. This dynamic, coupled with productivity increases over the same time period, indicates that technological progress, not trade, drove this decline.?
Fair Compensation:?Already more dangerous and less pleasant, manufacturing jobs also have a lower average wage than service sector jobs. If the Trump administration is successful in moving more jobs to the US, the average manufacturing wage will decrease further.?
“Supporters of protectionism seem to think that because manufacturing employment has been declining for decades, the US’s ability to produce has also been declining. Indeed, the assertion that ‘the United States doesn’t make things anymore’ is as common as it is incorrect. The US does not need to adopt protectionist policies—to say nothing of starting a severe global trade war—to create the capacity to produce goods; it already has that capacity.”—Michael Strain
Thanks for reading. For more data insights sent directly to your inbox, subscribe today. Email us?with questions or ideas at data.points@AEI.org
at Nicholas Byram, C.P.A.
2 周It's not "isolationism", for most of us. It is simply a realization that the USA is overextended, with too many commitments overseas, and going broke. A smaller of number of foreign policy commitments, done well, is much better than a larger number of them, NOT done well. We just plain need to pull back a bit. The Eurotrash, who have been getting a free ride from the USA for decades, need to step up more. To be honest, NOTHING is more annoying than Eurotrash (yes, I use the term here) boasting of their wonderful social programs, and looking down on the USA in particular in this respect, when the USA has, in effect, been paying their defense bills for decades now.
Senior Career Coach at Goodwill of Western and Northern Connecticut
3 周AEI is dreadful. Pro-war and neocon, AEI also makes the case for more immigration while discouraging the onshoring of jobs. In my job I work with clients who have no real employment possibilities other than retail, service sector, manufacturing, and low-paying care jobs like home health aides. AEI's policy proposals harm their employment opportunities and well-being.